September 11, 2012
Bob Berring
Finding the Law, R.I. P.
by Bob Berring ? September 11, 2012
When I went to work for Professor Morris Cohen at Harvard Law School in 1978 to serve as Deputy Director of the Library, he talked with me about joining him as co-author of How to Find the Law, the West Hornbook on legal bibliography and legal research that had already passed through seven editions. It was a standard work. Edition seven had a variety of authors writing individual chapters, with Morris both writing and serving as general editor. Now he wished a more cohesive approach, with the two of us as principal authors, relying on others to check us, but rethinking and rewriting the work. With ill-concealed delight I agreed to be his junior author. The book that we produced, How to Find the Law, 8thedition came out in 1983. It was almost eight hundred pages long, attempting to cover every aspect of legal bibliography, with special chapters on English and Canadian materials and even a chapter on New Media that included LEXIS and WESTLAW in their toddler years. Four years later, the Ninth edition came out in 1989. Having put almost every original thought that I had into the writing of the Eighth edition, I saw only incremental changes but Morris introduced new blood by adding Kent Olson to the team of authors. Kent may be the most skilled researcher whom I have known. He had been my student, but in name only. Kent always knew more about any topic than I did, and he possessed a finely edged wit. He was the perfect new person to add to the team. Much of his energy went into the ninth edition, just as mine had gone into the eighth. The book came out in 1989, one hundred pages shorter, and that counts some appendices that had been added. The book had it all.
Indeed, I thought that it had too much. The main competing text at that time was Fundamentals of Legal Research by Professor Jacobstein and Mersky. They had been clever enough to see that there was a market for a paperbound abridged edition of the book. They titled it Legal Research Illustrated. In the cheaper format the book could be sold as a text for shorter courses, perhaps used in paralegal schools or even undergraduate courses. This made sense to me. I reworked our text a bit and took the idea of making an abridged copy of How to Find the Law called, Finding the Law. Morris read over my work and felt it to be less than a book should be. How could we leave out details? But we persuaded him and Finding the Law published in 1989. The complexity of the title demonstrates the mixed emotions of the times. But the book did well. How to Find the Law was becoming a reference book, a book to be kept at the Reference Desk. Finding the Law a textbook. When I proposed a revision of Finding the Law, one that stood as an independent tool and less a true abridgement, Morris told me that he believed that there was value in what I suggested but that I was writing for law students that he did not understand, in a style that he could never embrace. As a sidebar, Morris is a painstaking stylist who writes pellucid prose. I have always festooned my work with pop culture references,?puns and humor. Nor could I ever write with the simple grace of Morris or Kent. Morris told me that I should take Finding the Law as my own, and that he and Kent would carry on with a revision of the big book. This is all greatly simplified, but I believe it to be accurate.
After that Finding the Law stood on its own. West had trouble deciding what designation the book should carry as a matter of bibliographic record. They wanted to retain a connection to its noble roots in the old book, but the connection was hard to capture. The edition ended up as Finding the Law, 10th edition. It was only the second edition of Finding the Law, and there was no 10th edition of How to Find the Law, so the edition statement was arbitrary. I tried to explain all of this in a Foreword. But who reads the Foreword?
For what was called the 11th edition of Finding the Law, I asked Beth Edinger of the Boalt Hall Law School reference staff to work with me. I wanted a co-author who was young enough to be part of the digital age, someone for whom online searching was natural. Beth fit the bill. She was both savvy and had a caustic wit that I enjoyed. Together she and I produced both the 10th and 11th editions. We tried to make the text readable and relevant. Adoptions were healthy and we faced the 21st century with optimism.
But students stopped reading books on research. All law schools had programs in Research and Writing, but the writing aspect waxed while the research component waned. If there are only going to be a few lectures on research, and the LEXIS and WESTLAW representatives are introducing the freely available Audis of research to each student, who is going to read a four hundred page book on building an engine? Would I have done so as a law student?
Beth and I agonized over this problem. I did not see the point in anything but a total rewrite for the next edition. Beth agreed but neither of us could bring ourself to do it. Morris and Kent had continued publishing the Nutshell on Legal Research and, notably, Kent finished a rewrite of the old, How to Find the Law, when he published Principles of Legal Research: Successor to How to Find the Law. Kent?s thorough, careful work won the Joseph P. Andrews Award from the American Association of Law Libraries as outstanding contribution to bibliography that year. It was almost as if period were being placed at the end of the great old book?s sentences.
After much thought, Beth and I are letting Finding the Law go. The world of textbooks in general is in flux, but I do not see a role for a standard textbook on legal research in it. I continue to believe in the value of research instruction, but it will not come via the standard printed textbook. That day is gone. Working with Morris was an honor. Watching Kent become a major figure in the field has been a delight. Writing with Beth was a treat. I wish that there were an honorable way to send Finding the Law off with a better salute, but let this column serve as its eulogy.
Sisyphean though it may prove, I am working on a new, totally different book on legal research. It will not truly be a book in the traditional sense, but it will look like one. If it works, it will come at things in an entirely different way. If it does not work, I plan to have fun trying. But for now, farewell Finding the Law. You were a grand adventure.
?
When I went to work for Professor Morris Cohen at Harvard Law School in 1978 to serve as Deputy Director of the Library, he talked with me about joining him as co-author of How to Find the Law, the West Hornbook on legal bibliography and legal research that had already passed through seven editions. It was a standard work. Edition seven had a variety of authors writing individual chapters, with Morris both writing and serving as general editor. Now he wished a more cohesive approach, with the two of us as principal authors, relying on others to check us, but rethinking and rewriting the work. With ill-concealed delight I agreed to be his junior author. The book that we produced, How to Find the Law, 8thedition came out in 1983. It was almost eight hundred pages long, attempting to cover every aspect of legal bibliography, with special chapters on English and Canadian materials and even a chapter on New Media that included LEXIS and WESTLAW in their toddler years. Four years later, the Ninth edition came out in 1989. Having put almost every original thought that I had into the writing of the Eighth edition, I saw only incremental changes but Morris introduced new blood by adding Kent Olson to the team of authors. Kent may be the most skilled researcher whom I have known. He had been my student, but in name only. Kent always knew more about any topic than I did, and he possessed a finely edged wit. He was the perfect new person to add to the team. Much of his energy went into the ninth edition, just as mine had gone into the eighth. The book came out in 1989, one hundred pages shorter, and that counts some appendices that had been added. The book had it all.
Indeed, I thought that it had too much. The main competing text at that time was Fundamentals of Legal Research by Professor Jacobstein and Mersky. They had been clever enough to see that there was a market for a paperbound abridged edition of the book. They titled it Legal Research Illustrated. In the cheaper format the book could be sold as a text for shorter courses, perhaps used in paralegal schools or even undergraduate courses. This made sense to me. I reworked our text a bit and took the idea of making an abridged copy of How to Find the Law called, Finding the Law. Morris read over my work and felt it to be less than a book should be. How could we leave out details? But we persuaded him and Finding the Law published in 1989. The complexity of the title demonstrates the mixed emotions of the times. But the book did well. How to Find the Law was becoming a reference book, a book to be kept at the Reference Desk. Finding the Law a textbook. When I proposed a revision of Finding the Law, one that stood as an independent tool and less a true abridgement, Morris told me that he believed that there was value in what I suggested but that I was writing for law students that he did not understand, in a style that he could never embrace. As a sidebar, Morris is a painstaking stylist who writes pellucid prose. I have always festooned my work with pop culture references,?puns and humor. Nor could I ever write with the simple grace of Morris or Kent. Morris told me that I should take Finding the Law as my own, and that he and Kent would carry on with a revision of the big book. This is all greatly simplified, but I believe it to be accurate.
After that Finding the Law stood on its own. West had trouble deciding what designation the book should carry as a matter of bibliographic record. They wanted to retain a connection to its noble roots in the old book, but the connection was hard to capture. The edition ended up as Finding the Law, 10th edition. It was only the second edition of Finding the Law, and there was no 10th edition of How to Find the Law, so the edition statement was arbitrary. I tried to explain all of this in a Foreword. But who reads the Foreword?
For what was called the 11th edition of Finding the Law, I asked Beth Edinger of the Boalt Hall Law School reference staff to work with me. I wanted a co-author who was young enough to be part of the digital age, someone for whom online searching was natural. Beth fit the bill. She was both savvy and had a caustic wit that I enjoyed. Together she and I produced both the 10th and 11th editions. We tried to make the text readable and relevant. Adoptions were healthy and we faced the 21st century with optimism.
But students stopped reading books on research. All law schools had programs in Research and Writing, but the writing aspect waxed while the research component waned. If there are only going to be a few lectures on research, and the LEXIS and WESTLAW representatives are introducing the freely available Audis of research to each student, who is going to read a four hundred page book on building an engine? Would I have done so as a law student?
Beth and I agonized over this problem. I did not see the point in anything but a total rewrite for the next edition. Beth agreed but neither of us could bring ourself to do it. Morris and Kent had continued publishing the Nutshell on Legal Research and, notably, Kent finished a rewrite of the old, How to Find the Law, when he published Principles of Legal Research: Successor to How to Find the Law. Kent?s thorough, careful work won the Joseph P. Andrews Award from the American Association of Law Libraries as outstanding contribution to bibliography that year. It was almost as if period were being placed at the end of the great old book?s sentences.
After much thought, Beth and I are letting Finding the Law go. The world of textbooks in general is in flux, but I do not see a role for a standard textbook on legal research in it. I continue to believe in the value of research instruction, but it will not come via the standard printed textbook. That day is gone. Working with Morris was an honor. Watching Kent become a major figure in the field has been a delight. Writing with Beth was a treat. I wish that there were an honorable way to send Finding the Law off with a better salute, but let this column serve as its eulogy.
Sisyphean though it may prove, I am working on a new, totally different book on legal research. It will not truly be a book in the traditional sense, but it will look like one. If it works, it will come at things in an entirely different way. If it does not work, I plan to have fun trying. But for now, farewell Finding the Law. You were a grand adventure.
?
Share: Email | Save as PDF | Print | Bookmark & Share | 
| 
Make a comment:
Note that some comments may be moderated. If you have not had an approved comment here before, your comment will be held for approval. We are glad to publish comments that address issues raised in the post or other comments on it and that contribute to a fruitful discussion. We do not publish comments that seek to promote commercial products, that make personal attacks, or that seek personal legal advice.
Although we do not require it, we ask that in making a comment you use your full name. You must supply a valid email address, which will not appear with your comment.
the count:
9063 posts | 12534 comments
search Slaw & SlawTips:
use "" + - AND OR NOT
Including blogs as of August 1, 2012
[about]
?
These summaries of selected recent cases are provided each week to Slaw by Maritime Law Book.
More information.
-
Insurance -?Marine insurance - Duties of insurer
The marine insurance in issue was excess third party liability cover, split between various syndicates and companies. The plaintiffs (the ?Irving Group?) sought indemnity from the defendant underwriters for sums paid to the Canadian government in settlement of ...
-
Criminal Law -?Sentencing - Considerations?
This case concerned identity theft involving almost $250,000. Subhag pleaded guilty to attempted theft of money (two counts), and theft of money (two counts), on Information 173471. On Information 185945, Subhag pleaded guilty to one count of theft of money. ...
-
Criminal Law -?Motor vehicles - Impaired driving - Meaning of ?care and control?
Smits was found guilty of having care or control of a motor vehicle while impaired and ?over 80? contrary to s. 253(1)(a) and s. 253(1)(b) of the Criminal Code, respectively. The trial ...
-
Civil Rights -?Freedom of the press - Limitations - Court proceedings (incl. broadcasting and publication bans)
The petitioner and respondent (parties) in a divorce proceeding both requested an order to seal the contents of their divorce file. They did so after having received a request ...
-
Customs -?Exports - General - Currency (incl. requirement of reporting amounts over $10,000)?
Docherty was subjected to a currency seizure when he failed to report CDN $335 and US $9,880 to Canadian Customs officials prior to his departure to Costa Rica. The Canadian conversion rate ...
-
Practice -?Trials - General - Mediation - Failure to attend?
At issue on this application was how a corporation could satisfy the obligation to attend a mediation mandated by s. 42 of the Queen?s Bench Act.
The Saskatchewan Court of Queen?s Bench dealt with the ...
Source: http://www.slaw.ca/2012/09/11/finding-the-law-r-i-p/
doj dept of justice weather chicago swizz beatz mpaa south carolina debate lauren scruggs
কোন মন্তব্য নেই:
একটি মন্তব্য পোস্ট করুন